The UQV (Ultimate Questioner's Vanity) Theory
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The UQV ( Ultimate Questioner ’ s Vanity ) Theory
The UQV theory is a metaphysical theory that the universe is the consequence of the ultimate questioner’s vanity 1 . This theory builds on the NSTP (Non – Spatial Thinking Process) theoretical metaphysical semi-solipsism, the position, which specifically regards the NSTP theoretical superhuman mind as a personal philosophical questioning supermind. The UQV theory further speculates the existenc...
متن کاملNumber Theory as the Ultimate Physical Theory ∗
At the Planck scale doubt is cast on the usual notion of space-time and one cannot think about elementary particles. Thus, the fundamental entities of which we consider our Universe to be composed cannot be particles, fields or strings. In this paper the numbers are considered as the fundamental entities.We discuss the construction of the corresponding physical theory. A hypothesis on the quant...
متن کاملIs “the theory of everything” merely the ultimate ensemble theory?
Perhaps the ultimate hope for physicists is that we will one day discover what is jocularly referred to as a TOE, a “Theory of Everything”, an all-embracing and self-consistent physical theory that summarizes everything that there is to know about the workings of the physical world. Almost all physicists would undoubtedly agree that such a theory is still conspicuous with its absence, although ...
متن کاملDeadly Medicine | Politics | Vanity Fair
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2011/01/deadly-medicine-201101?printable=true¤tPage=all[5/21/2011 8:50:22 AM] TAKE TWO ASPIRIN More and more clinical trials for new drugs are being outsourced overseas and conducted by companies for hire. Is oversight even possible? Photographs © Imagebroker/Alamy, from Image Source/Jupiter Images, © Vincent O’Byrne/Alamy (skulls); © Jason Salm...
متن کاملThe Vanity of the Economist: A Comment on Peart and Levy's The “Vanity of the Philosopher”*
In the Vanity of the Philosopher, Sandra Peart and David Levy reconsider “postclassical” economics from the vantage point of Adam Smith’s “analytical” egalitarianism. Analytical egalitarianism is assumed, not proved; and Peart and Levy’s criticisms of many 19and early 20-century economists, as well as eugenics in general, depend on equivocating between analytical and substantive egalitarianism....
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: SSRN Electronic Journal
سال: 2007
ISSN: 1556-5068
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.988051